la grafica es muy buena para crear contenido, para hacer stream, hablo de que se puede usar como dual GPU o pc para solo stream. por que para lo demás, no es ni buena para juegos, si para el competitivo pero no para la mayoría de los juegos, sus drivers son malos, así que no le metas mano mas que para ajustar el ventilador, los consumos son muy bajos, pero si se caliente mucho, como si fuera una GPU de laptop. En conclusión, si buscar el anhelado Codec AV1 para stream en youtube y futuramente para twitch. esta es la opción que necesitas, aun buen precio y resultado satisfactorios. "Recomendad" Read more

Using this for a Tdarr node for my Plex server, as well as one in my Plex server. The Tdarr node reencodes media faster than my 4080. And my Plex server easily manages 8+ streams without issue. All while not needing any additional power connectors. Probably sucks for anything else. But for AV1 work it goes hard. Read more

Compré el producto, instale los últimos controladores la resolución de mi monitor es 3440x1440 mis juegos favoritos no pudo correr en configuraciones arriba de baja con todo al mínimo de configuraciones, incluso bajando la resolución a 1080, mi anterior tarjeta de video con 8GB de memoria corre los mismos juegos a la resolución antes mencionada 1440 a 30/40 fps por lo que opté por regresar el producto 😕 totalmente desilusionado. Read more

I've upgraded from the 5700 XT, which has held down its fort perfectly for the last 5 years. After running one of many tests and seeing how well AMD was able to optimize its GPU via FSR and its improved rendering capabilities was what kept me with them for years, but I have now upgraded to this Intel Arc A770 GPU and there is a significant difference between the two. Granted the architecture of the two are years apart, so it is an unfair comparison, but the addition of Ray-tracing and how it adds another layer of descriptive graphic details to your experience as gamer is something that appears to be under-valued. There has been several generations of RT cores and its Ray-tracing capabilities, but I don't believe I've ran into a review that truly explains the differences of the two. After watching and testing several games with the 5700 XT and seeing it's max potential, I was able to see new graphical features that were not present with the 5700 XT, but are with the Arc A770. I don't believe anyone has explained how ray-tracing does change the overall appearance of the gamings atmosphere via different levels of graphic details, better details in reflections, and just added graphics that is not there without Ray tracing. One simple example, let me bring up an old game without ray-tracing, like Monster Hunter World running at 4k. Although the 5700 XT was able to run 4k and its highest settings with an average of 55 FPS, when you zoom up to the characters face, you can see the pixelated details to the drawings of the individuals face, but when you zoom up in Arc A770, you can actually see the sheen that reflects off of the characters face, which appears to be well-moisturized face. That one difference is clearly there and then there's more, but there's too much to describe. Anyhow, based on value, this has to be one of the best budget GPU's out here for the money with near top-tier performance. There are some minor issues with it though, and hopefully through better optimization, drivers, and application formats with better data set features, this GPU will unleash its full potential. The package came in without any damage and the box was in perfectly good, new condition. Thanks. Read more

Using Linux Kernel 6.6+, this is a GREAT choice for hardware acceleration. Extremely pleased with the performance this card provides. Read more