This presents as a sturdy, weighty solid timepiece. Good value for the money. My local jeweler charged by $5 to adjust the links--fits and wears well. Would buy again, quite possibly with a different colour (I have the blue, it looks stunning.) Also I can now tuck away my Tissot for special occasions. Read more

Product comes from US. So, a bit delayed. But, beautiful watch. Love it very much. Read more

I was in the market for a watch that I would wear on days that might be too rough on my automatic watches, yet wanted something that looked similar to my other watches. When I saw this watch, I didn’t have high expectations given its a Quartz and seemed too cheap for a diver style watch, but wow, I am amazed at what $50 can get you. The watch comes in a stylish packaging and comes with a lot of documents on how to change the date and time, adjust the bracelet, and other information about the watch. Out of the box, the diver came wrapped in plastic to protect the bracelet, and tags, like other watches of this style. Additionally, it came with a bracelet link remover to adjust the size to your fitting. The watch itself is beautiful. If I had not known it was $50, I would’ve thought this watch was in the hundreds. Yes, it looks like a Rolex Submariner, with its cyclops-style glass, but many other reputable watchmakers design their diver-style watches similarly. The casing and bracelet are made of stainless steel, which has some weight to it — weighing similar to my Seiko diver watch. Additionally, the bezel looks beautiful as its made of ceramic. Regarding its design, contrary to other reviewers, I have to say, this watch is nice to look at. I showed it to my friends heavily invested in Swiss-made watches, and they too were surprised at how shiny, heavy, and clean it looks. As for its time-setting and battery, I did not have much trouble with setting up the time. This watch’s crown is a push-pull style and not a screw-in, which meant that if you pulled the crown out two clicks, you are able to adjust the time and date. For its battery, it uses a small Sony battery, which should last a few years. Also, changing the battery should be fairly easy as I was able to open the case back within seconds. Overall, it’s a beautiful watch. The stainless steel casing and bracelet, ceramic bezel, and Mercedes-style watch hands truly make this watch seem more expensive than it actually is. The packaging and documents included with the watch were useful and made the unboxing experience feel like you’re opening an expensive Omega or Seiko watch. The pricing is very reasonable, especially when you factor in the warranty. I recommend this watch. Read more

The first one I got has a defective spring holder whole on the case, and the bracelet spring popped out constantly. I returned it with no problem, and I got an immediate replacement even before sent back the first one. Kudos to the company. The second wan was in perfect condition. I had the real deal Submariner before, and this hommage got the look and feel. Of course, no point in comparing them - they are in different leagues. This Reginald watch is not waterproof; definitely not to 300 m. Without a screw-down crown, it is impossible anyway. But after 9 months of everyday abuse, it still looks good, with no scratches on the glass or the bezel. Somebody was upset about the crystal not being sapphire. Helloooo! A sapphire crystal would cost more than the whole watch. I lost the dot from the bezel after 6 months, but it was easy to replace it with some fluorescent paint/superglue mix (see photo). Some review says the watch is not luminous. I don't know - if you keep it in the dark, maybe not, but if it is exposed to sunlight for a while and you go to a dark place, it is pretty bright for about 5 min. The hands are brighter than the dots. (See pictures.) Yes, the clasp is flimsy, but again what do you expect for this price? A new Submariner start around 20K. Even a used one costs at least 8K. For that money, they really have somewhat better clasps :D It actually beats the Submariner's accuracy. Of course, the automatic movement is inherently less accurate than a quartz movement, so it is not a real victory. During the nine months (268 days exactly), it gained 56 seconds. In other words, it is accurate to 0.2 seconds per day! Even for a quartz watch, it is excellent. In summary, it is a real deal for less than $40. Read more

رهيبه Read more